Creationists are very fond of accusing science of discrimination and censorship when it comes to their beliefs. They seem strangely unaware that the scientific method exists precisely to weed out those ideas which are not supported by the evidence.

Even more strangely the creationists are the ones who ask for declarations of faith and indulge in censorship.

A short series of posts covering this regular creationist claim from The Panda’s Thumb;

Is macroevolution impossible to study?

Is macroevolution impossible to study (Part 2)?

Is macroevolution impossible to study (Part 3)?

The Panda’s Thumb has an excellent article driving dome rather large holes through some claims from AIG here;

Dmanisi and Answers in Genesis

The ever excellent Panda’s Thumb recently had a couple of excellent posts addressing a perennial Creationist claim, that Macro-Evolution can’t be observed.

Is macroevolution impossible to study (Part 1)?

Is macroevolution impossible to study (Part 2)?